My Photo
Name:
Location: Argentina Neuquén Mission, Argentina

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Lieberman's Post-Partisan Nonsense

First off, I can’t find a single reputable news source reporting on Palin’s reported “Pledge of Allegiance” gaffe. Methinks this bit of nonsense originated with the same great thinkers who decided Palin faked her last pregnancy to take the hit for her daughter. Until I get confirmation from something other than a lefty Olbermannic blog, I’m betting this one’s a hoax.

Let’s get to Lieberman.

I’ve always sort of liked Joe Lieberman, more so in recent years, although he showed in 2000 that he can morph into as partisan a weenie as anyone. Yet it takes some guts to stand up in front of a bunch of Republicans and slam the nominee of your own party. The reasons he cites for doing it, however, make my skin crawl.

I quote:

I have personally seen John, over and over again, bring people together from both parties to tackle our toughest problems we face --to reform our campaign finance, lobbying and ethics laws, to create the 9/11 Commission and pass its critical national security reforms, and to end the partisan paralysis over judicial confirmations.


By “bring people together,” he means “sell out the Republicans.” “Campaign finance reform” guts the First Amendment. The 9/11 Commission was a Clintonian whitewash, and the Gang of 14 sold a huge chunk of Bush’s judicial nominees down the river.

It gets worse.


If John McCain was just another go-along partisan politician, he never would have taken on corrupt Republican lobbyists, or big corporations that were cheating the American people, or powerful colleagues in Congress who were wasting taxpayer money.

But he did!

If John McCain was just another go-along partisan politician, he never would have led the fight to fix our broken immigration system or to do something about global warming.

But he did!


Yes, he did – to most Republicans’ everlasting regret.

Time after time after time, McCain has badgered and belittled those of his own party rather than take the fight to those who should be his ideological opponents. He’s much more comfortable ripping the faces off GOP folks than he is offending his Liebermanic pals across the aisle.

Lieberman’s speech was unintentionally gruesome for a number of reasons. He even got muted applause for his praise of Clinton’s record, the great Dem “who worked with Republicans to get important things done like welfare reform, free trade agreements, and a balanced budget.”

Yeah, right. With the exception of NAFTA, which Clinton admirably championed of his own free will and choice, everything else was rammed down his throat by Newt Gingrich, a man Lieberman went out of his way to demonize when he was the vice presidential nominee. Clinton vetoed welfare reform twice! Until ’94, he never dreamed of a balanced budget. He never “worked with Republicans” the way McCain does – he stuck to his guns until political expediency forced his hand. Contrast that with McCain, who gleefully throws right wingers under the bus at the first opportunity.

Lieberman said some wretched things about partisanship, too. Witness thus:

Our founding fathers foresaw the danger of this kind of senseless partisanship. George Washington himself -- in his Farewell Address to our country -- warned that the "spirit of party" is "the worst enemy" of our democracy and "enfeebles" our government's ability to do its job. George Washington was absolutely right. The sad truth is -- today we are living through his worst nightmare, in the capital city that bears his name.


His worst nightmare? Really? What was the Civil War, then – nightmare #7? All this hokey post-partisan blather ignores the fact that we’re no more divided now than we’ve been in the past. Those who want us to put partisanship aside and “get something done” conveniently overlook that they never want to get done what the other party wants done. Yet this was the drivel that Lieberman unleashed in full force.

Here’s the deal, Joe. I would prefer partisan gridlock to most of what McCain’s gotten done in the name of bipartisanship. Rather than the disembowelment of free speech rights, the creation of trillions of dollars of cap and trade taxes to fight a nonexistent problem, and the advancement of judicial tyranny, I’d rather Congress sat on its hands and did absolutely nothing. (Maybe they could crochet. Or weave baskets.)

“Working together” doesn’t do anyone any good when what you’re working to accomplish is loathsome. After all, the Germans, the Japanese, and the Italians worked together quite well during World War II, and it would have been awfully nice if they hadn’t.

Palin or no Palin, I’m back to Jacques Cousteau ’08.

3 Comments:

Blogger John Larocque said...

I thought of you earlier when I scanned this. Seems to touch on some of the same points.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1837218,00.html

September 3, 2008 at 12:03 PM  
Blogger John Larocque said...

A couple of other things. You remember the Romney attack ads saying that Mac was "close" to Hillary Clinton, and another on a host of bills beginning with McCain/Feingold (Thompson), McCain/Kennedy etc.. basically Mac is the Democratic party's best friend? There's some small truth, in that democratic outreach has always been McCain's approach. He and Lindsay Graham wanted Lieberman for the VP slot but at the last minute they went for McCain. Joe was vetted and he was in the top four, along with Palin, Romney, and either Ridge or Pawlenty (or both). Much of Joe's speech was intended, apparently, to be his VP speech.

Carly Fiorina has actively been recruiting "Citizens for McCain", essentially Hillary Clinton supporters and Independents. She has met with a limited amount of success. If you google her name, you might catch a few articles on her activities. She met with John Coale the husband of Fox Television's "Greta", who was an HRC backer and friend of the Clinton family... who now backs McCain. A few weeks ago, Hillary's brother Tony Rodham met with her and asked her about Supreme Court nominations.

After the Obama coronation, the HRC recruitment went into full gear, with ads featuring ex-HRC supporters, and Hillary's words being used against the ObaMessiah.

Mac's record on global warming, torture, Campaign Finance Reform, have all been part of that outreach. Mac is counting on anti-Obama Democrats to help him win in November.

Anyway, plug "Fiorina" and "Coale" into Google and you'll get a gist of what's going on. There was also a New York Times piece on financial backers of HRC like The Donald now switching to Team McCain.

September 3, 2008 at 12:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You had me lmfao with the congressional basket weaving.

SM

September 3, 2008 at 5:59 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home