Debate Wrap-Up
I’m very grateful to have avoided blogging my way through perhaps the most frustrating of all the presidential debates. It wasn’t the most boring – that was the last one – but this one demonstrated, more than any other, why John McCain is easily the worst Republican presidential candidate to get the GOP nomination in my lifetime.
McCain was “feisty,” according to Tom Brokaw in the follow-up, which is a nice way of saying he was cranky, testy, condescending, and argumentative. Plus he blinked too much and smiled like Igor from all the vampire movies. He moaned and whined about Obama’s friends calling him nasty names. He then tried to link Obama to domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and the voter fraud machine known as ACORN , but his heart wasn’t in it. Instead, he boasted, again, about what a disloyal Republican he’s been, even managing to compromise himself on the one issue that might have persuaded me to vote for him: the judiciary. Over the weekend, he stated that Obama’s potential Supreme Court nominees would be just dandy, and tonight, he trumpeted his support for judicial tyrants Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer and bragged about cutting off the GOP at its knees with his dumb “Gang of 14,” which undermined the Bush administration’s judicial nominees.
He also let Obama get away with murder - i.e. infanticide - on the Born Alive Act and partial-birth abortion.
In the meantime, Obama looked like a grown-up and, once again, sounded like a conservative. He promised a “net spending cut” after implementing all his new federal programs, which is either a freakin’ lie or the biggest, dumbest demonstration of ignorance possible. Mathematically, it simply can’t be done, especially while entitlement spending continues to consume a metastasizing share of the federal budget. He also, again, promised a tax cut for 95% of all Americans, overlooking the fact that 47% of American PAY NO INCOME TAXES. yet McCain ignored that completely, because he doesn’t understand it, either. He ran to the left of Obama on his asinine “let’s buy everyone’s mortgage!” plan, and he was unable to articulate, in any coherent fashion, a single conservative idea, beyond a nebulous support of tax breaks for his pal Joe the Plumber.
And you know Joe the Plumber’s going to show up in the Saturday Night Live sketch, don’t you?
I just stand aghast that this is the man my party has decided represents me and what I believe. He doesn’t. He doesn’t even come close. If he’s elected, the GOP will lose any connection to the principles that first attracted me to it. How can I vote for that? How can anyone vote for that?
I cannot stomach Obama, either, but I will say this: if someone put a gun to my head and said I had to vote for one or the other – instead of throwing my vote away, which is what I intend to do – I’d have to accept that there are essentially two Democrats in this race, and the right thing to do is to cast a ballot for the only one who is honest enough to put a D by his name.
Obama’s going to be the next president. That’s a terrifying thought. The only thing more terrifying is the idea of John McCain as our next president.
Heaven help us.
McCain was “feisty,” according to Tom Brokaw in the follow-up, which is a nice way of saying he was cranky, testy, condescending, and argumentative. Plus he blinked too much and smiled like Igor from all the vampire movies. He moaned and whined about Obama’s friends calling him nasty names. He then tried to link Obama to domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and the voter fraud machine known as ACORN , but his heart wasn’t in it. Instead, he boasted, again, about what a disloyal Republican he’s been, even managing to compromise himself on the one issue that might have persuaded me to vote for him: the judiciary. Over the weekend, he stated that Obama’s potential Supreme Court nominees would be just dandy, and tonight, he trumpeted his support for judicial tyrants Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer and bragged about cutting off the GOP at its knees with his dumb “Gang of 14,” which undermined the Bush administration’s judicial nominees.
He also let Obama get away with murder - i.e. infanticide - on the Born Alive Act and partial-birth abortion.
In the meantime, Obama looked like a grown-up and, once again, sounded like a conservative. He promised a “net spending cut” after implementing all his new federal programs, which is either a freakin’ lie or the biggest, dumbest demonstration of ignorance possible. Mathematically, it simply can’t be done, especially while entitlement spending continues to consume a metastasizing share of the federal budget. He also, again, promised a tax cut for 95% of all Americans, overlooking the fact that 47% of American PAY NO INCOME TAXES. yet McCain ignored that completely, because he doesn’t understand it, either. He ran to the left of Obama on his asinine “let’s buy everyone’s mortgage!” plan, and he was unable to articulate, in any coherent fashion, a single conservative idea, beyond a nebulous support of tax breaks for his pal Joe the Plumber.
And you know Joe the Plumber’s going to show up in the Saturday Night Live sketch, don’t you?
I just stand aghast that this is the man my party has decided represents me and what I believe. He doesn’t. He doesn’t even come close. If he’s elected, the GOP will lose any connection to the principles that first attracted me to it. How can I vote for that? How can anyone vote for that?
I cannot stomach Obama, either, but I will say this: if someone put a gun to my head and said I had to vote for one or the other – instead of throwing my vote away, which is what I intend to do – I’d have to accept that there are essentially two Democrats in this race, and the right thing to do is to cast a ballot for the only one who is honest enough to put a D by his name.
Obama’s going to be the next president. That’s a terrifying thought. The only thing more terrifying is the idea of John McCain as our next president.
Heaven help us.
14 Comments:
Vote for Palin. But ready your wallet for Carter's 2nd term.
Vote for Palin if you're functionally illiterate or deaf/blind.
and, btw, calling McCain a Democrat is one of the most intellectually dishonest pieces of tripe I've come across anywhere in the press or blogs. Please, Mr. Stallion, you're brighter than that.
Why do I come here? I have no idea.
pjg- Where are you coming from? What is your beef with Palin? I am neither functionally illiterate, nor deaf, nor blind. At least she understands that the VP has a constitutional role in the Senate while Mr. Biden (who is viewed as so experienced and intelligent) thinks the VP has no role in the Senate except to cast a tie breaking vote. Biden is wrong on that, and he also wrongly cited the wrong Article in the Constitution to back up his view – but only a deaf and blind person would give him a pass on that. More directly to you deaf point, apparently Biden is in fact deaf, as he thinks Obama never said he would meet leaders of countries like Iran, Syria, North Korea, and others without precondition.
Also, calling McCain a Democrat is not only pretty accurate, it's nicer than what most of us would call him. On the other hand, Mr. Spread-The-Wealth will make sure that we are all equal. Too bad we will all be equally miserable and poor.
Either way, we are all going to pay more taxes, apply for mortgages and other credit from the federal government, and endure unbelievable actions from jurists who legislate from the bench. There are a number of rough years ahead. But I guess I am bitterly clinging to my religion and guns.
You come here, pjg, because I'm so damn good looking.
fletch, I'm a big pjg fan, so I'm warning you that if you really want to go down that road with him, it's gonna get perhaps more colorful than you're anticipating. If you decide to take the journey, I'll be waiting here back at the homestead, hoping you're able to make it back.
pjg, re: McCain the Democrat, perhaps a more accurate label for Beavis is "Even Republicans." Throughout the Bush years, whenever the media ran a negative piece on the administration, they'd begin the sentence with "even Republicans are starting oppose this [fill in the blank]." Invariably, the antecedent for "even Republicans" was John McCain.
I can't wait to see Joe the Plumber on SNL. I guess McCain had to have something to fixate on besides, "My friends".
I hate to sound naive, but i came across some commentary over how this election is realy going to boil down to racism. That means EVERYONE, so don't automaticaly assume anything.
Jesus Christ i wish you Americans would just get over yourselves sometime.
This is one of the greatest tests of your Country and your Democracy since it's creation. There is no disputing that Obama is the best choice for a lot more reasons than may be apparant to some, if not most, or is that moist?
I'am still shaking my head that Palin used Obamas connections to the less than popular leaders in the world as a swipe against him.
Please tell me she isn't THAT naive.
McCain represents all that came before (wasn't that fun?) and Obama represents all the possibilities of what might be.
I'll follow Obama any day of the week, black skin and all.
SB
stuntman bob - ебать вашу мать
Obama is not qualified to be President of the United States for many reasons. But first and foremost he is not qualified because he is a socialist.
The pigmentation in his skin has nothing to do with anything. Many Republicans would prefer Colin Powell as a candidate over John McCain.
There's absolutely no good reason that the American electorate should be obligated to vote for Obama simply because he happens to be the first black presidential candidate to come down the pike.
телефон жесткий парень
SB
My biggest concern is that when he is sworn in as president he'll have a Foreign and Domestic target on his back.
Let alone getting started.
SM
Помните, когда секретная служба открывается С.С.
Я думаю, что должностное лицо протокол, возможно, хотели бы вновь изучить, что холодная война фигня.
SB
That's easy for you to say, SB.
SC, nice summary of the bailout, although I'm mad as hell at the idiots who would invest in something as foolhardy as credit default swaps. Any reasonable person saw the collapse of Freddie and Fannie 4 years ago. (Your bro must have seen it coming). That was when I knew Greenspan was a moron because he was surprised at the number of people who were electing for fixed rates as opposed to variable rate mortgages. What a moron...Greenspan.
Back to Obama, I don't know why Europeans like him so much. He's a protectionist and would be against arrangements that result in jobs going to Europe at the expense of jobs here. e.g., Northrup/Airbus defense contract. That would be a big blow to Europeans if Boeing gets the contract. But that's a trivial matter.
Besides we're not voting for a king here. Congress still has to legislate the damn things before a President can sign them into law. However, if the dems get a sweeping enough majority in the Senate to override a filibuster and when things subsequently go to excrement...well, the pendulum will start swinging the other way.
But the differences between McCain and Obama are exaggerated. Obama's not the issue...unless as a leader he condones immorality, which implicitly he may.
America's condoning immorality is the issue that will lead to our demise. It's the law! And it's been irrevocably decreed...whether you like it or not...
I just caught the bay area news on satellite, Palin is >still< quoting Reagan. The crowds are licking it up, i wonder if half of them even know how to spell his name.
I think i'll send her an ouija board for christmas.
SM
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home